Legal Opinion
Aramark Facility Services v. Service Employees International Union, Local 1877
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 16, 2008No. 06-56662PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HALL, Circuit Judge:
I. INTRODUCTION
This case arose from the response by Aramark Facility Services (“Aramark”) to a “no-match letter” from the Social Security Administration (“SSA”), which indicated that Aramark had reported information for 48 of its employees at the Staples Center in downtown Los Angeles that did not match the SSA’s database. Suspecting immigration violations, Aramark told the listed employees they had three days to correct the mismatches by proving they had begun the process of applying for a new social security card. Seven to ten days later, Aramark fired the 33 employees…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- United Paperworkers International Union v. Misco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- W. R. Grace & Co. v. Local Union 759, International Union of the United Rubber, Cork, Linoleum & Plastic WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Eastern Associated Coal Corp. v. United Mine Workers, District 17Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Hoffman Plastic Compounds, Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Community House, Inc. v. City of Boise, IdahoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Matthews v. National Football League Management CouncilCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Halicki Films, LLC v. Sanderson Sales & MarketingCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Maya Arce v. John HuppenthalCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- Aspic Engineering and Constr. v. Ecc Centcom Constructors LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.