Legal Opinion

People v. Henry

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 7, 1992PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

— Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: There is no evidence in the record of the suppression hearing to show that defendant’s arraignment was delayed for the purpose of depriving defendant of his right to counsel. Defendant is not entitled to a new hearing to present additional evidence, having had the opportunity at the first hearing to litigate that issue (see, People v Cofresi, 60 NY2d 728). Moreover, any delay in the arraignment was justified in light of the ongoing murder investigation (see, People v Hopkins, 58 NY2d 1079; People v Barker, 168 AD2d 211, lv denied 77 NY2d 875).

We…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. HopkinsNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. People v. BarkerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  3. People v. CofresiNew York Court of Appeals · 1983

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. SantiagoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  2. People v. McCallAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  3. People v. SampsonNew York Supreme Court · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API