Legal Opinion

Springer v. Young

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided December 10, 1886PublishedCited by 31 opinions

Yamhill County. Defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtStrahan, J.

This suit is prosecuted by the plaintiff against the defendants, to establish an implied trust in her favor in certain lands situated in Yamhill County. The defendant Nancy S. Young is the plaintiff’s daughter, and C. W. Young is hor husband ; May Wilson is also a daughter of the plaintiff, and J. C. Wilson is her husband; and Grace Springer is a minor, a daughter of the plaintiff, and is represented by her guardian ad litem.

It appears from the facts in this case that George W. Springer, in bis lifetime, was tbe husband of the plaintiff, and that they resided together as husband and wife, in…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Rung v. ShonebergerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1833
  2. Hendricks v. RassonMichigan Supreme Court · 1884
  3. Linnville v. SmithOregon Supreme Court · 1876
  4. McMasters v. BellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1830

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Raymond v. FlavelOregon Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Curtis v. La Grande Hydraulic Water Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Mendenhall v. WaltersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  4. Bowmaster v. CarrollCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1928
  5. Flesner v. CooperSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API