Legal Opinion
State v. Niska
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided March 25, 1994No. C4-92-1478PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PAGE, Justice.
The state and the defendants, Charlotte and Harvey Niska, have sought review of portions of the decision of the court of appeals in a pre-trial appeal by the state. The Niskas were charged by complaint with seven offenses: (1) deprivation of custodial, parental or visitation rights under Minn.Stat. § 609.26, subd. 1(1) (Supp.1985); (2) deprivation of custodial or visitation rights under Minn.Stat. § 609.26, subd. 1(3) (Supp.1985); (3) aggravated forgery under Minn.Stat. § 609.625, subd. 3 (1986); (4) aggravated forgery under Minn.Stat. § 609.625, subd. 3 (Supp.1987); (5)…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Calder v. BullSupreme Court of the United States · 1798
- Bell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Miller v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Rewis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Marriage of Nardini v. NardiniSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Gassler v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
- State v. LeathersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
- State v. AuchampachSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
- State v. StevensonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
- Braylock v. JessonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.