Legal Opinion

Aylett v. Universal Frozen Foods Co.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 20, 1993No. 9110-06420; CA A75957PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLandau, J.

Plaintiffs appeal from a summary judgment for defendant in this action for breach of the contractual duty of good faith and fair dealing and for intentional interference with “prospective business advantage. ” We review each claim to determine whether defendant demonstrated that it is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Seeborg v. General Motors Corporation, 284 Or 695, 699, 588 P2d 1100 (1978). We view the evidence in the light most favorable to plaintiffs. 284 Or at 699.

Plaintiffs are potato growers, and defendant is a potato processor. Each year before harvest, potato grower…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Seeborg v. General Motors CorporationOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Top Service Body Shop, Inc. v. Allstate InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Best v. United States National BankOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Georgetown Realty, Inc. v. Home InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Straube v. LarsonOregon Supreme Court · 1979

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Highland Enterprises, Inc. v. BarkerIdaho Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Klamath Off-Project Water Users, Inc. v. PacifiCorpCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
  3. Schram v. Albertson's, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
  4. Stevens v. ForenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
  5. Cron v. ZimmerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API