Legal Opinion

City of Leawood v. Puccinelli

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided June 22, 2018No. 118165PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Leben, J.:

Robert Puccinelli appeals his conviction for driving under the influence of alcohol, raising two points. We do not find either of them persuasive.

First, he argues that allowing a police officer to testify about how Puccinelli did on field sobriety tests violated Puccinelli's Fourth Amendment right to be free from unreasonable searches. But field sobriety tests aren't searches under the Fourth Amendment at all. For the most part, the tests simply check for physical actions associated with inebriation, something that a careful observer might learn simply from watching the defendant.

Sec…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Pennsylvania v. MimmsSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Florida v. JardinesSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  4. United States v. DionisioSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Missouri v. McNeelySupreme Court of the United States · 2013

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. HicksCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2025
  2. State v. McAnallyCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API