Legal Opinion
In re A. B. H.
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided August 18, 1975No. 8197PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PAIR, Associate Judge, Retired:
The appellant, a juvenile, was adjudged to have committed the offense of robbery (purse snatching).1 He appeals the judgment by contending (1) that the evidence was insufficient to support the trial court’s finding of his involvement in the robbery, and (2) that the trial court committed reversible error by its failure to invoke the sanctions of the Jencks Act2 when a government witness, a police officer, was unable to produce his notes of an interview with the complainant.
At approximately 11:40 p. in. on September 15, 1973, the complainant was walking near…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- McGautha v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- United States v. AugenblickSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- United States v. CalderonSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Bernard Austin v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1967
- Earl R. Cephus v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1963
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Frendak v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
- Mills v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991
- Franey v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1978
- Moore v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
- March v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1976
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.