Battle v. Mercer
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtClarkson, J.
This was a motion to set aside a judgment for excusable neglect. The court below found “that neither of the defendants Mary S. Mercer, John E. Mercer, T. C. Tilghman or Margaret M. Tilghman has a meritorious defense to this action.”
In Farmers and Merchants Bank v. Otho H. Duke, Admr., ante, 389, it is said: “It is well settled in this State that the application should show not only mistake, inadvertence, surprise or excusable neglect, but also a meritorious defense. Land Co. v. Wooten, 177 N. C., 250, and cases cited; 23 Cyc., 962, 1031.”
As to the merits of the controversy, the plaintiffs in…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Skinner v. . TerrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
- Thompson v. . SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
- Jones-Onslow Land Co. v. WootenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1919
- Taylor v. . PopeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
- Hunter v. . KellySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1885
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Patrick Ex Rel. Michal v. BryanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
- Dunn v. . JonesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
- Calaway v. . HarrisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
- Morris v. WilkinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
- Howard v. . HinsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.