Legal Opinion
Deutz & Crow Co. v. South Dakota State Cement Plant Commission
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided February 13, 1991No. 17035, 17047PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HENDERSON, Justice.
PROCEDURAL HISTORY/ISSUES/HOLDING
This is a case instituted against the South Dakota State Cement Plant. We affirm on the basis that the action is barred by the Statute of Limitations.
On May 16, 1988, Deutz & Crow Co., Inc. (Deutz & Crow) commenced this action against the South Dakota State Cement Plant Commission (Cement Plant). In their Complaint, Deutz & Crow alleged claims for breach of contract, tortious interference, bad faith, fraud and deceit, negligent misrepresentation, negligence, punitive damages, cost of money and collateral es-toppel. The Cement Plant admitted…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Brick v. Cohn-Hall-Marx Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1937
- Triangle Underwriters, Inc. v. Honeywell, Inc. And Honeywell Information Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
- Groseth International, Inc. v. Tenneco, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
- Pickering v. PickeringSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
- Arcon Construction Co. v. South Dakota Cement PlantSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Citibank, N.A. v. FriedmanDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2024
- Deutz & Crow Co. v. South Dakota State Cement Plant CommissionSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
- Grynberg v. Citation Oil & Gas Corp.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
- Grynberg v. Citation Oil & Gas Corp.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
- Moeller v. StateSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.