Legal Opinion
Citibank, N.A. v. Friedman
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided August 15, 2024No. 1:23-cv-02420Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK CITIBANK, N.A., MEMORANDUM & ORDER Plaintiff, 23-CV-02420 (NGG) (RML) -~against- SHULEM FRIEDMAN and MIRIAM FRIEDMAN, Ci efenddatts. NICHOLAS G. GARAUFIS, United States District Judge. Plaintiff Citibank, N.A. (“Citibank” or “Plaintiff’) brings several claims against Defendants Shulem and Miriam Friedman (“Fried- mans” or “Defendants”) for allegedly pursuing a fraudulent scheme to misuse and overcharge nine personal credit accounts with Citibank. (See Am. Compl. (Dkt. 16) § 8-10, 19-24.) Citi- bank seeks to recover $1,738,035.63 in…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Chambers v. Time Warner, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
- Hayden v. PatersonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
- Bridgestone/firestone, Inc. v. Recovery Credit Services, Inc., Revenue Recovery, Inc. And George BeladinoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.