Mulsow v. Gerber Energy Corp.
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Lockett, J.:
Plaintiffs brought four actions, which were later consolidated, for partition of oil and gas leases in which plaintiffs owned shares of the working interests. Plaintiffs did not request partition of the overriding royalty interests or the landowners’ royalty interests. Appellant Regan filed a cross-claim and counterclaim against the other parties, praying that the overriding royalty interests be included in the partition. The trial court denied the motion and partitioned the leasehold estates excluding the overriding royalty interests.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Fry v. DeweesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1940
- Cosgrove v. YoungSupreme Court of Kansas · 1981
- Holland v. ShafferSupreme Court of Kansas · 1947
- Miller v. MillerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1977
- Cline v. AngleSupreme Court of Kansas · 1975
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Sims v. SimsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1996
- Gore v. BerenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1994
- DaMac Drilling, Inc. v. ShoemakeCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1986
- Oxy USA, Inc. v. Colorado Interstate Gas Co.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 1994
- Reitmeier v. KalinoskiDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1986
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.