Legal Opinion
Uddin v. Mayorkas
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided May 16, 2012No. Civil Action No. 06-5275PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
ANITA B. BRODY, District Judge.
Plaintiffs Mohammed2 and Arshia Uddin, husband and wife, bring suit against Defendants Alejandro Mayorkas, Director of U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Ser*394vices (“USCIS”),3 Perry Rhew, Director of the Administrative Appeals Office of US-CIS, and Tony Dyson, Director of the Philadelphia Office of USCIS (collectively, “the Government”). The Uddins seek judicial review, pursuant to the Administrative Procedures Act, 5 U.S.C. §§ 701-06, of the Government’s denial of their applications for adjustment of status to lawful permanent resident.4 The Uddins…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Camp v. PittsSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Amer Bioscience Inc v. Thompson, Tommy G.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2001
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- American Farm Bureau Federation v. United States Environmental Protection AgencyDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2013
- Dorley v. CardinaleDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2015
- Tomasi v. Twp. of Long BeachDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2019
- Elfeky v. JohnsonDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2017
- Romanyuk v. LynchDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2015
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.