Burton v. Dixon
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.
There are two questions for decision: (1) Does the counterclaim state a cause of action? (2) If so, is there a misjoinder of parties and causes?
Accepting the factual allegations of the counterclaim as true and construing them liberally, as we must in passing upon the demurrer (Rubber Co. v. Distributors, Inc., 251 N.C. 406, 410, 111 S.E. 2d 614), we are of the opinion that the facts alleged are sufficient to constitute a cause of action for damages arising from a conspiracy to take possession of C. P. Wilson's property and convert it to the use of plaintiff and her husband.
A conspiracy is…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Lesnik v. Public Industrials CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
- State v. PattersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
- Muse v. MorrisonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
- John L. Roper Lumber Co. v. WallaceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1885
- Jones v. MonsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1909
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Krawiec v. ManlySupreme Court of North Carolina · 2018
- State v. SmallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
- State v. StroudCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
- Fox v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
- Alexander & Alexander, Inc. v. B. Dixon Evander & Associates, Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1991
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.