Legal Opinion

United States v. Reyna

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided January 28, 2004No. 01-41164PublishedCited by 121 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

W. EUGENE DAVIS, Circuit Judge:

We took this case en banc to consider whether the district court’s failure to give the defendant an opportunity to allocute as required by Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 32 is subject to either harmless error or plain error review. For the reasons that follow, we conclude that, in the absence of an objection by the defendant, such a failure is subject to plain error review.

I. FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS

The panel, in United States v. Reyna, 331 F.3d 448 (5th Cir.2003), gave a cogent statement of the facts and background which we reproduce below:

Miguel Enrique Reyna…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  3. United States v. YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Hill v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  5. MacHibroda v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by121 opinions

  1. United States v. Yervin K. BarnettCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
  2. United States v. Anthony Gerald White, Sr.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2005
  3. United States v. Jose Escalante-ReyesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2012
  4. United States v. BrantleyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2008
  5. United States v. BetancourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2009

116 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API