State v. Kendrick
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
BROCK, Judge.
Defendant assigns as error that the trial court denied defendant’s motions to dismiss. The testimony of Anderson, the accomplice, was sufficient for submission to the jury upon the issue of aiding or abetting; this assignment of error is overruled.
Defendant assigns as error that the trial court instructed the jury that it could return a verdict of guilty if it was satisfied beyond a reasonable doubt from the unsupported testimony of the accomplice that defendant was guilty. Defendant argues that the unsupported testimony of an accomplice should not support a verdict of guilty.…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- State v. BirchfieldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
- State v. ArnoldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
- State v. TerrellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
3Cited by11 opinions
- State v. BronsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971
- State v. PryorCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
- State v. CostiganCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
- State v. GanttCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975
- State v. ShawCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.