Legal Opinion

State v. Gantt

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided July 16, 1975No. 7525SC245PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CLARK, Judge.

The defendants contend that the trial court committed prejudicial error in failing to charge the jury on the lesser included offense of nonfelonious breaking and entering. The neces sity for such a charge, however, arises '. . when and only when there is evidence from which the jury could find that such included crime of lesser degree was committed. The presence of such evidence is the determinative factor. Hence, there is no such necessity if the State’s evidence tends to show a completed robbery and there is no conflicting evidence relating to elements of the crime charged.”…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. Marshall Norman HicksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  2. State v. ArnoldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  3. State v. BurnetteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  4. State v. MitchellCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975
  5. State v. . MurraySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. LoganOhio Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Clyde Stevenson v. Sue KoskeyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
  3. Clyde Stevenson v. Sue KoskeyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
  4. State v. StinnettOhio Court of Appeals · 2016
  5. State v. FarringtonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API