Legal Opinion

State v. Costigan

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided April 7, 1981No. 8010SC1043PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARTIN (Robert M.), Judge.

By his appeal, defendant challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to justify submission to the jury of the issue of felonious breaking and entering in violation of N.C. Gen. Stat. § 14-54(a). More specifically, the defendant argues that the State failed to present sufficient evidence of an essential element of the crime as charged, i.e., an intent to commit larceny. We disagree.

N.C. Gen. Stat. § 14-54(a) makes it a crime to break or enter any building “with intent to commit ... larceny therein.” An essential element of the crime is the specific intent to steal…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. GoinesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  2. State v. MurphySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  3. State v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  4. State v. KendrickCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970
  5. State v. HillCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
  2. State v. RobertsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
  3. State v. GarciaCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
  4. State v. CrumpCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
  5. State v. GriffinCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2019

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API