Legal Opinion

Brinkman v. City of Indianapolis

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided November 28, 1967No. 20,628PublishedCited by 74 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

This appeal comes to us from the Marion Superior Court, Room No. 2, where this action was brought by the appellant, Louise Brinkman, as administratrix of the estate of Jack B. Brinkman, deceased, for funeral expenses, compensatory and punitive damages, and attorney fees resulting from the alleged wrongful death of the decedent, Jack B. Brinkman.

The facts, as alleged in substance in the amended complaint and disclosed by the record, are as follows:

The defendant-appellee, Carl V. Lambert, a police officer from the City of Indianapolis Police Department, was summoned to the residence of Mr.…

Also in this document: Concurrence; Dissent.

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Molitor v. Kaneland Community Unit District No. 302Illinois Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Muskopf v. Corning Hospital DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Holytz v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Williams v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Hargrove v. Town of Cocoa BeachSupreme Court of Florida · 1957

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by74 opinions

  1. Ayala v. Philadelphia Board of Public EducationSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  2. Jones v. State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 1977
  3. Campbell v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Kitto v. Minot Park DistrictNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Benton v. City of Oakland CityIndiana Supreme Court · 1999

69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API