Legal Opinion

Denault v. Cote

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided March 15, 2001No. 3 — 00—0460PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Breslin

Plaintiffs John and Megan Denault filed an action against defendants Eugene and Francis Cote, claiming they violated the Illinois Residential Real Property Disclosure Act (Disclosure Act) (765 ILCS 77/1 et seq. (West 1998)). The trial court dismissed the action as untimely. When the plaintiffs filed a second action based on fraud in the same real estate transaction as the first case, the court dismissed the Denaults’ second action on the basis of res judicata. We affirm this decision and hold that the limitations period encompassed within section 60 of the Disclosure Act is not a limitations…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. River Park, Inc. v. City of Highland ParkIllinois Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Fredman Bros. Furniture Co. v. Department of RevenueIllinois Supreme Court · 1985
  3. People v. WrightIllinois Supreme Court · 1999
  4. The People v. SomervilleIllinois Supreme Court · 1969
  5. Petty v. CrowellAppellate Court of Illinois · 1999

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Belleville Toyota, Inc. v. Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Illinois-American Water Co. v. City of PeoriaAppellate Court of Illinois · 2002
  3. Guerrero v. PiotrowskiDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2014
  4. Grady v. SikorskiAppellate Court of Illinois · 2004
  5. Belleville Toyota, Inc. v. Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 2002

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API