Legal Opinion

River Park, Inc. v. City of Highland Park

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided November 19, 1998No. 85246PublishedCited by 380 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McMORROW

This case arises from the efforts of plaintiffs River Park, Inc., Spatz & Company, and Country Club Estates, Ltd., to develop a parcel of real estate located within defendant City of Highland Park. After defendant failed to approve their plan to develop the property and their request for rezoning, plaintiffs sought relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) by filing a complaint against defendant in federal court. Following the dismissal of their federal cause of action, plaintiffs asserted various violations of state law in an amended complaint filed against defendant in the circuit court of Lake…

2Cases cited58 opinions

  1. Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  2. Ex Parte McCardleSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
  3. Barr v. Resolution Trust Corp. Ex Rel. Sunbelt Federal SavingsTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Grava v. Parkman TownshipOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Massachusetts School of Law at Andover, Inc. v. American Bar Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1998

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by380 opinions

  1. Robinson v. Toyota Motor Credit Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Adair v. StateMichigan Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Ennenga v. StarnsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012
  4. Heard v. SheahanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001
  5. Nowak v. St. Rita High SchoolIllinois Supreme Court · 2001

375 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API