Legal Opinion
Hemmings v. Tidyman's Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided April 11, 2002No. Nos. 99-35932, 99-35984PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPregerson, Circuit Judge, joined by Thomas, Circuit Judge,
Judge THOMAS delivered the opinion of the Court as to Parts VIII and IX. Judge PREGERSON joined as to Part VIII and dissents specially from Part IX.
RONALD M. GOULD, Circuit Judge joined as to Parts I, II, III, IVA, IVB, V, VI, VII, VIII and IX and filed a dissenting opinion as to Part IVC.
PREGERSON, Circuit Judge.
This appeal arises out of a jury verdict in favor of two women who sued their *1178employer for sex discrimination. The women, Connie Hemmings (“Hemmings”) and Patty Lamphiear (“Lamphiear”), charged their employer, Tidyman’s Inc. (“Tidyman’s”), with discriminating against them on the…
2Cases cited67 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Northern Pipeline Construction Co. v. Marathon Pipe Line Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Connie Hemmings and Patty Lamphiear v. Tidyman's Inc., a Washington Corporation, Connie Hemmings and Patty Lamphiear v. Tidyman's Inc., a Washington CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- United States v. OliverCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- United States v. BenavidezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- United States v. LawCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- United States v. MarksCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.