Legal Opinion

Connie Hemmings and Patty Lamphiear v. Tidyman's Inc., a Washington Corporation, Connie Hemmings and Patty Lamphiear v. Tidyman's Inc., a Washington Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided April 11, 2002No. 99-35932PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court 1

285 F.3d 1174

Connie HEMMINGS and Patty Lamphiear, Plaintiffs-Appellees,

v.

TIDYMAN'S INC., a Washington Corporation, Defendant-Appellant.

Connie Hemmings and Patty Lamphiear, Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v.

Tidyman's Inc., a Washington Corporation, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 99-35932.

No. 99-35984.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted March 5, 2001.

Filed April 11, 2002.

COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED Richard C. Eymann, Eymann, Allison, & Hunter, Spokane, WA, for the plaintiffs-appellees-cross-appellants.

James Michael Kalamon, Paine, Hamblen, Coffin, Brooke &…

Also in this document: Opinion of the Court · Pregerson; Dissent.

2Cases cited71 opinions

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  5. Northern Pipeline Construction Co. v. Marathon Pipe Line Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982

66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Arbino v. Johnson & JohnsonOhio Supreme Court · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API