State v. Daniels
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtThornton, J.
Defendant appeals from his conviction for armed robbery after trial to the court. He contends that the trial court erred in the following particulars:
1) Ruling admissible defendant’s inculpatory statements to the investigating officers.
2) At time of sentence, failing to specify in ordering restitution the period of time or number of instalments within which defendant had to pay $590.95 to the victim.
The essential facts may be summarized as follows:
On the night of May 21, 1978, John Schuyler was beaten and robbed by two persons in a campground near Florence on the Oregon coast. He described…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Ball v. GladdenOregon Supreme Court · 1968
- State v. WarnerOregon Supreme Court · 1978
- State v. TurnerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
- State v. RodriguezCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. CarpenterCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
- State v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
- State v. CoxCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980