Meetz v. Mohr
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco dissolving an injunction. J. M. • Seawell, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtVan Dyke, J.
Following the complaint in this case, temporary injunction was issued, and the defendants thereafter, upon notice and supported by affidavit and answer to the complaint, moved the court to dissolve the same, which was granted, and the appeal is taken from such order dissolving the injunction.
The complaint stated substantially the following facts: That plaintiff’s testator, Theodor Meetz, on the twelfth day of February, 1897, made and delivered to defendant, M. J. Rudolph Mohr, a promissory note for sixteen hundred dollars, and at the same time conveyed to Emil Mohr, as trustee, a deed of…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Bradford Investment Co. v. JoostCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
3Cited by3 opinions
- Producers Holding Co. v. HillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- Salot v. WershowCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
- Dool v. First National BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930