Legal Opinion

Syar v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 28, 1942No. Civ. No. 6666PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTuttle, J.

Plaintiffs seek to recover damages for breach of contract. At the close of their case, a motion for nonsuit was granted, and this appeal is prosecuted from judgment of dismissal thereafter entered.

The following statement of the facts is made in view of the well-known rule that on a motion for nonsuit, every favorable inference fairly deducible and every favorable presumption fairly arising from the evidence must be considered facts proved in favor of plaintiff; contradictory evidence must be discarded and the evidence weighed in the light most favorable to plaintiffs’ claim. Relevant evidence…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Lawall v. GromanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1897
  2. Kast v. Miller & LuxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Parker v. BondSupreme Court of Alabama · 1898
  4. Garber v. BlatchleyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1902
  5. O'Leary Bros. v. German-American InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1896

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. PorterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1951
  2. Frank Pisano & Associates v. TaggartCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
  3. West Coast Life Insurance v. CrawfordCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
  4. Clifton Cattle Co. v. ThompsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
  5. Boone v. HallCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API