Syar v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtTuttle, J.
Plaintiffs seek to recover damages for breach of contract. At the close of their case, a motion for nonsuit was granted, and this appeal is prosecuted from judgment of dismissal thereafter entered.
The following statement of the facts is made in view of the well-known rule that on a motion for nonsuit, every favorable inference fairly deducible and every favorable presumption fairly arising from the evidence must be considered facts proved in favor of plaintiff; contradictory evidence must be discarded and the evidence weighed in the light most favorable to plaintiffs’ claim. Relevant evidence…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Lawall v. GromanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1897
- Kast v. Miller & LuxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
- Parker v. BondSupreme Court of Alabama · 1898
- Garber v. BlatchleyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1902
- O'Leary Bros. v. German-American InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1896
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. PorterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1951
- Frank Pisano & Associates v. TaggartCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
- West Coast Life Insurance v. CrawfordCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
- Clifton Cattle Co. v. ThompsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
- Boone v. HallCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.