Legal Opinion

Zeigler v. Town of Kent

District Court, D. Connecticut

Decided April 27, 2003No. 3:00CV1117(GLG)PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GOETTEL, District Judge.

Plaintiff Elbert Zeigler has brought this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against the Town of Kent, its Planning and Zoning Commission, and the individual members of the Commission, alleging that certain conditions imposed on a zoning permit for his automobile body shop violated his constitutional rights under the Equal Protection and Due Process Clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment. Defendants have moved for summary judgment [Doc. #33]. For the reasons set forth below, their motion will be granted.

Background

This dispute concerns an .878-acre parcel of land…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Village of Willowbrook v. OlechSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Carol A. Gallo v. Prudential Residential Services, Limited Partnership, Doing Business as Prudential Relocation ManagementCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
  4. Federal Communications Commission v. Beach Communications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. Heller v. Doe Ex Rel. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1993

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Gavlak v. Town of SomersDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2003
  2. PR Diamonds, Inc. v. ChandlerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API