Legal Opinion
State v. O'DONNELL
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided December 27, 2007No. 25660-0-IIIPublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
174 P.3d 1205 (2007)
STATE of Washington, Respondent,
v.
Eric Edward O'DONNELL, Appellant.
No. 25660-0-III.
Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 3.
December 27, 2007.
Jordan Broome McCabe, Attorney at Law, Bellingham, WA, for Appellant.
Kevin Michael Korsmo, Attorney at Law, Spokane, WA, for Respondent.
KULIK, J.
¶ 1 Eric Edward O'Donnell appeals his conviction for first degree robbery. Mr. O'Donnell contends the trial court erred by omitting the words "in the presence of" in the "to convict" jury instructions and by failing to define "theft." Mr. O'Donnell also contends there was insufficient…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- State v. GreenWashington Supreme Court · 1980
- State v. ScottWashington Supreme Court · 1988
- State v. HoffmanWashington Supreme Court · 1991
- State v. NgWashington Supreme Court · 1988
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- State v. ColemanCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2010
- State v. ColemanCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2010
- State v. StacyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
- State v. SchalerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
- State v. SchalerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.