Schoenwald v. Diamond K Packing Co.
Washington Supreme Court
1DissentHolcomb, J.
(dissenting) — The prevailing opinion is too narrow, and it is not in accord with the letter and spirit of the declaratory judgment act, Rem. Rev. Stat. (Sup.), § 784-1 [P. C. § 8108-21] et seq., Laws of 1935, chapter 113, p. 305, as amended by Laws of 1937, chapter 14, p. 39.
That act, among other things, provides:
§ 784-1. “Courts of record within their respective jurisdictions shall have power to declare rights, status and other legal relations whether or not further relief is or could be claimed. . . . The declaration may be either affirmative or negative in form and effect; and such…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Hess v. Country Club ParkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
- Tolle v. StruveCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
- RKO Distributing Corp. v. Film Center Realty Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1936