Legal Opinion

Schnitzer v. Josephthal

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1923PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtProskauer, J.

Plaintiff moves to strike out a separate defense and counterclaim as insufficient in law.

The complaint alleges a partnership between plaintiff and defend*16ants to conduct a banking and brokerage business for a term, the wrongful expulsion of plaintiff by defendants therefrom and appropriation of the assets thereof before the expiration of the term. The usual prayer for an accounting follows.

The answer adds to denials a separate defense setting up that defendants ascertained after formation of the firm that plaintiff had prior thereto procured from one defendant $12,500 in a manner constituting…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Karrick v. HannamanSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  2. Westwood v. ColeNew York Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Dumont v. RuepprechtSupreme Court of Alabama · 1861
  4. Westwood v. CrisseyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1910

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Dobson v. DobsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1980
  2. Smith v. MaineNew York Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Richard Friedman and Albert Fagerberg v. Golden Arrow Films, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1971
  4. Birnbaum v. BirnbaumAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
  5. Truly v. AustinTexas Supreme Court · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API