Legal Opinion

Klos v. Gockel

Washington Supreme Court

Decided October 14, 1976No. 44150PublishedCited by 55 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWright, J.

This appeal arises from an action by home buyers against the builder-vendor. The patio area and backyard were damaged from a mud slide and the settling of fill. The issue herein is the extent of the rights and obligations arising from the implied warranty of habitability or fitness. The case of House v. Thornton, 76 Wn.2d 428, 457 P.2d 199 (1969) contains the basic statement of the law on that species of warranty, it being stated at page 436 that

when a vendor-builder sells a new house to its first intended occupant, he impliedly warrants that the foundations supporting it are firm and secure…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Tavares v. HorstmanWyoming Supreme Court · 1975
  2. House v. ThorntonWashington Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Hartley v. BallouSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  4. Yepsen v. BurgessOregon Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Gilley Ex Rel. Gilley v. FarmerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1971

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by55 opinions

  1. ATHERTON CONDO APARTMENT-OWNERS ASS'N BD OF DIRECTORS v. Blume Dev. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Stuart v. Coldwell Banker Commercial Group, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1987
  3. McDonald v. MianeckiSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1979
  4. Tusch Enterprises v. CoffinIdaho Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Smith v. Foerster-Bolser Construction, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 2006

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API