Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Sielcken

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided July 1, 1941PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Foley, S.

This is an intermediate application in the accounting proceeding in which a firm of attorneys and an individual attorney seek direction for the immediate payment to them of the balance of their fees, which was awarded pursuant to intermediate "determinations of the surrogate. The remaining sums due the firm of Duer, Strong & Whitehead, of which Mr. Selden Bacon was the active counsel for the executor, were fixed at $48,670.39. To Mr. Leonard B. Smith was awarded a balance of $2,797 for services rendered. (Matter of Sielcken, N. Y. L. J. March 15, 1940, p. 1196; Matter of Sielcken,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of SielckenNew York Surrogate's Court · 1937
  2. In re Dunbar & Sullivan Dredging Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1935
  3. Dunbar & Sullivan Dredging Co. v. Fidelity & Deposit Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1935
  4. In re the Estate of HackfeldNew York Supreme Court · 1939
  5. In re the Estate of KornderNew York Surrogate's Court · 1938

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In re the Accounting of EinachNew York Surrogate's Court · 1955
  2. In re the Estate of ReeceNew York Surrogate's Court · 1983
  3. In re the Estate of SielckenNew York Surrogate's Court · 1941
  4. In re the Accounting of ClarkNew York Surrogate's Court · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API