Legal Opinion
In re the Estate of Hackfeld
New York Supreme Court
Decided June 14, 1939PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Foley, S.
The application for an order permitting the disbursement of funds now in the hands of the ancillary executor for the purpose of paying counsel fees in connection with the appeal by the ancillary executor from the judgment entered in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York on April 7, 1939, and for the payment of the disbursements in connection with said appeal is denied.
It has been determined by the judgment recovered by the United States that there is due and owing from the ancillary executor, the defendant in that action, the sum of approximately…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- In re Dunbar & Sullivan Dredging Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1935
- Dunbar & Sullivan Dredging Co. v. Fidelity & Deposit Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1935
3Cited by4 opinions
- United States v. SillimanDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1946
- In re the Estate of SielckenNew York Surrogate's Court · 1941
- In re the Estate of HackfeldNew York Surrogate's Court · 1943
- In re the Estate of Van DerpoolNew York Surrogate's Court · 1955