Legal Opinion

United States v. Andrew Modjewski

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided April 13, 2015No. 13-3012PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Per curiam

Andrew Modjewski presented the testimony of a psychiatric expert during his sentencing hearing in hopes that it would reduce his sentence for possession and delivery of an extremely large amount of child pornography. At the sentencing hearing, after the defense conducted its direct examination and the government cross-examined the expert, the district court judge engaged in lengthy and direct questioning of the expert, much of it regarding whether Modjewski could be classified as having a pedophilic identification. Though the expert said Modjewski could not, the judge came to her own contrary…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Liteky v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  4. United States v. AtkinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  5. Charles COLLINS, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. D.J. KIBORT and Educational Therapy Center, Defendants-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. United States v. Eric WindingCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2016
  2. United States v. David BridgewaterCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2020
  3. United States v. Edward Dorsey, Sr.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2016
  4. United States v. Juan PerezCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2020
  5. United States v. Travis MaxfieldCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2016

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API