Legal Opinion

Ford v. Bank of America Corp.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 1, 2006No. A05A2063PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Barnes, Judge.

Hazel Ford appeals the trial court’s grant of summary judgment to Bank of America Corporation on her complaint for damages resulting from a slip and fall. For the reasons that follow, we affirm.

On appeal we review the trial court’s grant of summary judgment de novo to determine whether the evidence, viewed in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party, demonstrates a genuine issue of material fact. Summary judgment is proper only when no issue of material fact exists and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Preferred Real Estate Equities v. Housing…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Moore v. Goldome Credit Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1988
  2. Desai v. Silver Dollar City, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
  3. Fletcher v. Amax, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
  4. Preferred Real Estate Equities, Inc. v. Housing Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2001
  5. Metts v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2004

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. All Fleet Refinishing, Inc. v. West Georgia National BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2006
  2. Hathaway Development Co. v. American Empire Surplus Lines Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2009
  3. JNJ Foundation Specialists, Inc. v. D. R. Horton, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2011
  4. Prime Home Properties, LLC v. Rockdale County Board of HealthCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2008
  5. Danforth v. Government Employees InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2006

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API