Legal Opinion

Panhandle & S. F. Ry. Co. v. Laird

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 16, 1920No. 1687PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Potter County; Henry S. Bishop, Judge. Action by A. E. Laird against the Panhandle & Santa Fé Railway Company. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtHuff, C. J.

This action was brought by Laird against the railway company for damages for personal injuries and for injury to an automobile, by coming into collision with appellant’s train at a crossing on the public highway. The jury found the appellee was guilty of contributory negligence, thereby eliminating all issues except the issue of discovered peril, upon which the judgment herein is based. It is alleged in effect in appel-lee’s petition that just before the plaintiff’s injury appellant’s servants discovered him coming towards the crossing, and discovered that he and his automobile were in peril…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Trochta v. Missouri, K. & T. Ry. Co. of TexasTexas Commission of Appeals · 1920
  2. Dallas Hotel Co. v. FoxCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1917
  3. Cathey v. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Roth v. Travelers' Protective Assn. of AmericaTexas Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Houston & Texas Central Railroad v. FinnTexas Supreme Court · 1908

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Morgan v. MaundersCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1930
  2. Texas Employers Ins. Ass'n v. ShiffletteCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1936
  3. Red Arrow Freight Lines v. GravisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935
  4. Texas Employers' Ins. Ass'n v. DavidsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926
  5. Cabaniss v. Grayburg Oil Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1932

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API