Legal Opinion
Fairchild v. State
Idaho Court of Appeals
Decided February 13, 1996No. 21294PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PERRY, Judge.
In this ease we are asked to review the summary dismissal of an application for post-conviction relief. After reviewing the record and applicable law, we affirm.
I
FACTS AND PROCEDURE
Based on information from confidential informants and an ongoing drug investigation, a Ketchum police officer obtained a search warrant for a mobile home and two vehicles which belonged to Roger Kim Fairchild. As a result of the search, Fairchild was charged with possession of cocaine with intent to deliver and possession of marijuana in excess of three ounces. I.C. §§ 37-2732(a)(l)(A), - 2732(e). In…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- McCray v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Aragon v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 1988
- Roman v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 1994
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Murphy v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 2006
- Newman v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 2004
- Raudebaugh v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 2001
- Aeschliman v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 1999
- Bagshaw v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 2005
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.