Legal Opinion
United States v. Rob Shorty
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided October 30, 1998No. 98-2343PublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KANNE, Circuit Judge.
Rob Shorty appeals the sentence imposed as a result of the revocation of his supervised release, claiming that 18 U.S.C. § 3583(h), which permits a court to revoke a defendant’s supervised release and resen-tence the defendant to a combination of imprisonment and supervised release, violates the Ex Post Facto Clause of the United States Constitution. Shorty argues that § 3583(h) should not be applied to him because Congress enacted the statutory provision after he committed the underlying offense. Shorty believes, at minimum, his case is distinguishable from the facts…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Weaver v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Collins v. YoungbloodSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Dobbert v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Miller v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- California Department of Corrections v. MoralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- John Anderson v. Patrick DonahoeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012
- Robert Westefer, Mark Vonperbandt, Allejandro Villazana v. Donald Snyder, Odie Washington, Michael v. NealCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005
- United States v. Ignasio Maldenaldo Sanchez, United States of America v. Santiago Gilberto SanchezCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2001
- Demetrius McCann Plaintiff-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Sam A. Mangialardi, Defendant-Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
- United States v. David Carrera and Luis M. CarreraCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.