Herrick v. Catley
New York Court of Common Pleas
Appeal by the defendant from, a judgment of the Eighth District Court. . - .The facts are fully stated in the opinion of the Court.
1Opinion of the Court
By the Court.
Daly, F. J.
plaintiff testified that he was employed by the defendant’s wife to procure a divorce for her from the defendant, and that lie called upon the defendant and had a long interview with him. The plaintiff did not state for what purpose he called upon the defendant, or what the interview between them had reference to. He testified that he called upon the defendant again, and that the defendant requested him to call upon Mrs. Catley, and see if he could not effect an adjustment of the difficulties between them; to try and settle, and report the result to him. That he…
2Cited by16 opinions
- In re CowderyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- Silbiger v. Prudence Bonds CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1950
- In re BooneU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern California · 1897
- Strong v. International Building Loan & Invest. UnionIllinois Supreme Court · 1899
- State v. HalsteadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1887
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.