In re Cowdery
California Supreme Court
Application for the disbarment of an attorney and counselor at law. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtThornton, J.
J. F. Cowdery, at the times hereafter mentioned and prior thereto an attorney and counselor of this court, is accused as follows: That Cowdery was
in December, 1881, the attorney and counselor of the city and county of San Francisco, and continued so to be up to the fifth day of January, 1883; that while he was such attorney and counselor he took appeals in the cases of Bonnet v. City and County of San Francisco and Parker v. City and County of San Francisco from the judgments which had been given and made in each of said cases against the city and county, which appeals were pending at the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Michoud v. GirodSupreme Court of the United States · 1846
- Valentine v. StewartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
- Wilson v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1861
- Price v. Grand Rapids & Indiana RailroadIndiana Supreme Court · 1862
- Jackson v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1858
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by73 opinions
- Anderson v. EatonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
- In re BooneU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern California · 1897
- Steeley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1920
- In re OWisconsin Supreme Court · 1889
- Brown v. MillerDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1923
68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.