State v. Halstead
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Union District Court — Hon. John W. Har j yet, Judge. Defendant was convicted upon an indictment for embez element, and now appeals to this court.
1Opinion of the CourtBeok, J.
i embezzledence: ham: etTwnttenkby defendant. I. The defendant was employed by the National Lumber Company, and had charge of its business at Preston. His duties required him to make sales °*' lumber, receive payments made to the comPauy in the course of its business at Crestón, make payments and remittances as required in the proper management of the business, and make daily written reports to the company by letter addressed to its place of business in Chicago. The evidence tends to show that all the money received by the defendant was not accounted for by him; the shortage being a…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- In re CowderyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- Wilson v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1861
- Price v. Grand Rapids & Indiana RailroadIndiana Supreme Court · 1862
- Gaulden v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1851
- Delaney v. ErricksonNebraska Supreme Court · 1880
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- People v. GeroldIllinois Supreme Court · 1914
- Clifton v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
- State v. LeighSupreme Court of Kansas · 1955
- Steeley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1920
- In re OWisconsin Supreme Court · 1889
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.