Legal Opinion

State Farm Insurance v. Harmon

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided November 27, 2002No. 1 — 01 — 2838PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Reid

Following mandatory arbitration in a subrogation action for damage to the vehicle of plaintiffs insured, an award was entered in favor of plaintiff State Farm Insurance Company and against defendant Robert L. Harmon. Defendant rejected the award, and the circuit court subsequently barred plaintiff from presenting testimony or evidence at trial and entered summary judgment for defendant Robert L. Harmon. On appeal, plaintiff contends the trial court abused its discretion in finding that plaintiff did not participate in the arbitration hearing in a meaningful manner. Plaintiff further contends…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Martinez v. GaimariAppellate Court of Illinois · 1995
  2. Schmidt v. JosephAppellate Court of Illinois · 2000
  3. Hill v. Joseph Behr and Sons, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1997
  4. Hinkle v. WomackAppellate Court of Illinois · 1999
  5. Goldman v. DhillonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1999

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Norris v. National Union Fire InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 2006
  2. Ruback v. DossAppellate Court of Illinois · 2004
  3. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Co. v. KogutAppellate Court of Illinois · 2004
  4. State Farm Mutual Insurance v. NasserAppellate Court of Illinois · 2003
  5. Givens v. RenteriaAppellate Court of Illinois · 2003

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API