Legal Opinion

State Farm Mutual Insurance v. Nasser

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided February 10, 2003No. 1-01-4526PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice O’Malley

The plaintiff, State Farm Mutual Insurance Company, filed this action against defendant, Ibrahim Nasser, alleging that his negligent driving caused an accident with its insured, Harivada Acharya. Following mandatory arbitration, an award was entered in favor of plaintiff. Defendant filed a timely notice of rejection of the award, which was allowed by the trial court. Defendant subsequently filed a motion to bar plaintiff from presenting any evidence or testimony at trial as a sanction under Supreme Court Rule 91(b) (145 Ill. 2d R. 91(b)) for its failure to participate in good faith at the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Sander v. Dow Chemical Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Martinez v. GaimariAppellate Court of Illinois · 1995
  3. Schmidt v. JosephAppellate Court of Illinois · 2000
  4. Employer's Consortium, Inc. v. AaronAppellate Court of Illinois · 1998
  5. Goldman v. DhillonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1999

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Co. v. KogutAppellate Court of Illinois · 2004
  2. State Farm Mutual Insurance v. SantiagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 2003
  3. Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co. v. KogutAppellate Court of Illinois · 2004
  4. Government Employees Insurance v. SmithAppellate Court of Illinois · 2005
  5. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. CulbertsonAppellate Court of Illinois · 2005

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API