United States v. Haywood
U.S. Army Court of Military Review
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
SU-BROWN, Judge:
Contrary to his pleas, appellant was tried by a military judge sitting as a general court-martial and convicted of larceny, willful damage to military property, and three specifications of assault with a dangerous weapon, in violation of Articles 121, 108 and 128, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 921, 908 and 928 (1976). He was sentenced to a dishonorable discharge, confinement at hard labor for 15 months, and forfeiture of all pay and allowances.
The facts in this case focus upon appellant’s use of a fragmentation grenade against a…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- United States v. FrederickUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1977
- United States v. Cortes-CrespoUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
- United States v. MartinezU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1981
- United States v. Cortes-CrespoU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1980
- United States v. ClevelandU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1979
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- United States v. MansfieldU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1987
- United States v. BenedictU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1985