Legal Opinion

United States v. Cortes-Crespo

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided August 9, 1982No. 39,264; CM 434897PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court

FLETCHER, Judge:

Following affirmance of appellant’s general court-martial by the Court of Military Review, this Court granted the following issue:

WHETHER THE EVIDENCE IS INSUFFICIENT AS A MATTER OF LAW TO HAVE REBUTTED APPELLANT’S CLAIM OF MENTAL IRRESPONSIBILITY.

However, at the time of the initial oral argument on June 23, 1981, the Court expressed concern that the granted issue was unduly generalized. Our attention centered on the mental responsibility test of United States v. Frederick, 3 M.J. 230 (C.M.A.1977), and the proper instructions thereon to be given to fact…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. FrederickUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1977
  2. ROSTKER, DIRECTOR OF SELECTIVE SERVICE, Et Al. v. GOLDBERG Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. United States v. Cortes-CrespoU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1980

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. United States v. BenedictUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1988
  2. United States v. BenedictU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1985
  3. United States v. HargroveUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1987
  4. United States v. Van TasselUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1993
  5. United States v. DockU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1992

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API