United States v. Cortes-Crespo
United States Court of Military Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court
FLETCHER, Judge:
Following affirmance of appellant’s general court-martial by the Court of Military Review, this Court granted the following issue:
WHETHER THE EVIDENCE IS INSUFFICIENT AS A MATTER OF LAW TO HAVE REBUTTED APPELLANT’S CLAIM OF MENTAL IRRESPONSIBILITY.
However, at the time of the initial oral argument on June 23, 1981, the Court expressed concern that the granted issue was unduly generalized. Our attention centered on the mental responsibility test of United States v. Frederick, 3 M.J. 230 (C.M.A.1977), and the proper instructions thereon to be given to fact…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- United States v. FrederickUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1977
- ROSTKER, DIRECTOR OF SELECTIVE SERVICE, Et Al. v. GOLDBERG Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- United States v. Cortes-CrespoU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1980
3Cited by15 opinions
- United States v. BenedictUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1988
- United States v. BenedictU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1985
- United States v. HargroveUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1987
- United States v. Van TasselUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1993
- United States v. DockU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1992
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.