Legal Opinion

Landsberg & Co. v. Hein Construction Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 30, 1909PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal by the defendants, the Hein Construction Company and others, from a judgment of the Supreme Court in favor of the defendant Bucldey, Woodhull & Burns, entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Kings on the 11th day of November, 1908, upon the decision of thé court rendered after a trial at the Kings County Special Term.

1Opinion of the Court

Woodward, J.:

The respondent, Buckley, Woodhull & Burns, a corporation, is a mechanic’s lienor, having filed a notice of lien, prior to the lien of plaintiff, for a balance due for lumber and timber. This corporation was. made a party defendant, answered and set up its lien, and asked for a foreclosure thereof and, in the alternative,, for a personal judgment against the defendant Hein Construction Company, the owner of the real property and the purchaser of the lumber. The plaintiff and certain other defendants did not appear upon the trial, and the questions determined related to the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Woolf v. SchaeferAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1905

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Chambers v. George Vassar's Sons & Co.New York Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Friedman v. LowensteinAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1912
  3. Margulies v. Seigel, New York County Courts1919

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API