Chambers v. George Vassar's Sons & Co.
New York Supreme Court
Action to foreclose a mechanic’s lien.
1Opinion of the CourtPage, J.
This action is brought to foreclose a mechanic’s lien. In all there were twenty-five such liens involved in this action, and several legal questions were raised upon the trial and by the briefs of various counsel which will first be considered. It is contended that as to materialmen their recovery must be limited to such materials as were delivered within the period of ninety days of the filing of the notice of lien. The cases relied upon to sustain this contention (Spencer v. Barnett, 35 N. Y. 94, 97; Goodale v. Walsh, 2 T. & C. 311; Tiley v. Thousand Island Hotel Co., 9 Hun, 424; Duffy v.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Stryker v. . CassidyNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
- Herrmann & Grace v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1909
- Herrmann Grace v. . the City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1910
- Spencer v. . BarnettNew York Court of Appeals · 1866
- Rinn v. Electric Power Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Jesse F. Heard & Sons v. Southwest Steel ProductsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1960
- Campbell v. TeepleCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1925
- Dorn v. JohnsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1962
- Coast Electric Co. v. Industrial Indemnity Co.California Court of Appeal · 1983
- American Cement Corp. v. Dunetz Bros.New York Supreme Court · 1965
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.