Legal Opinion

Margulies v. Seigel

New York County Courts

Decided August 15, 1919Published

Action to foreclose a mechanic’s lien.

1Opinion of the CourtMacMahon, J.

This is an action in rem brought by plaintiff who seeks to foreclose a mechanic’s lien for the sum of $400 for painting work performed and materials furnished on defendants’ property described in the complaint.

*484Plaintiff began the work under an agreement in writing with defendants dated September 3, 1918, and completed said work on September 21,1918. By terms of said agreement plaintiff agreed to perform said work and furnish said materials to defendants for the sum of $400, and to accept in payment defendants ’ four promissory notes for one hundred dollars each, made and dated as follows: The…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Happy v. . MosherNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
  2. Woolf v. SchaeferAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1905
  3. Rukeyser v. Fountain & Choate, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1918
  4. Linneman v. BieberNew York Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Ringle v. Wallis Iron WorksNew York Supreme Court · 1895

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API