Legal Opinion

In re Barber

District Court, E.D. Wisconsin

Decided August 20, 1896PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Application by E. L. Barber for Habeas Corpus.

1Opinion of the Court

SEAMAN, District Judge.

The petitioner is imprisoned upon commitment by a commissioner of this court for alleged violation of section 3893, Bev. St., as amended by the act of congress of September 26, 1888 (25 Stat. 496), in sending through the mails envelopes, unsealed, containing dunning letters, described in the complaint and mittimus as follows:

“On the outside of which envelopes in which said dunning letters were inclosed was printed in ten points, or long primer French Clarendon, type, in the English language, the following libelous, scurrilous, and defamatory words *981and language, to wit,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. SmithDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1891
  2. Olmstead v. Distilling & Cattle-Feeding Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the Northern District of Illnois · 1895
  3. United States v. DodgeDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1895
  4. United States v. BrownU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Vermont · 1890

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Tollett v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1973
  2. Ex Parte ShowCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1910
  3. McKnight v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1935
  4. Ray Allen Tollett v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API