Herrington v. Central Soya Co., Inc.
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
The trial of this cause resulted in a jury verdict for Defendants Herrington and Burt on their counterclaim alleging a contract between Defendants and another, the obligations of which Plaintiff Central Soya allegedly agreed to fulfill. Central Soya's motion for a new trial was granted; Defendants' motion for reconsideration of the order granting a new trial was denied; and Defendants filed this appeal.
In denying Defendants' motion for reconsideration, the trial judge set out a summary of the facts of the case and the grounds for his decision to grant a new trial:
"Attached to the Plaintiffs'…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Cobb v. MaloneSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
- Hill v. CherrySupreme Court of Alabama · 1980
- Westmoreland v. PorterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1883
- Proctor v. CoffeySupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
- Walker v. HendersonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1963
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Hammond v. City of GadsdenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1986
- Nunn v. WhitworthSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
- Louisville & Nashville RR v. AtkinsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1983
- Fendley v. Dozier Hardware Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1984
- Northeast Alabama Regional Medical Center v. OwensSupreme Court of Alabama · 1991
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.