Legal Opinion

Leigh v. Laughlin

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided June 23, 1904PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from the Branch Appellate Court for the First District;—heard in that court on appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook county; the Hon. ,0. H. Horton, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Cartwright

In this case there is no material disagreement between counsel as to the law. The question to be decided is one of fact, upon which the master in chancery to whom the issue was referred found in favor of appellee, and on exceptions to his report the circuit court decided in favor of appellant, and the Branch Appellate Court for the First District, which reviewed the evidence on appeal, arrived at the same conclusions as the master.

The suit grew out of a claim by appellant that he was jointly interested with appellee in a contract made by the latter with the Chicago Railway Equipment Company,…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Leigh v. National Hollow Brake-Beam Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Chicago Railway Equipment Co. v. National Hollow Brake Beam Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1912
  3. Chicago Railway Equipment Co. v. National Hollow Brake Beam Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1912
  4. Leigh v. LaughlinAppellate Court of Illinois · 1905
  5. Bennett v. WoolseyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1911

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API